Attorney Hüseyin Aydın – Lawyer in Alanya
Although Turkish legislation and the case law of the high courts establish a legal regime bound by extremely strict conditions, detailed administrative supervision and severe criminal sanctions, illegal armament and the use of unlicensed firearms are encountered more and more frequently on the streets, in judicial statistics and in news bulletins. The fact that the circulation of unlicensed weapons in society has reached such alarming proportions while the statutory framework is so harsh and uncompromising clearly shows that the issue is not merely a technical breach of law but a deep, bleeding social wound. At the root of this burning contradiction lie unregistered weapons smuggled into the country or put on the market after blank-firing pistols have been illegally converted in backstreet workshops to fire live ammunition, gaps in the supervision of online platforms, the inadequacy of preventive policing in the field, and enforcement practices that lack any deterrent effect.
Preventing this enormous social crisis, in which innocent people suddenly lose their lives for nothing because of a moment of anger, carelessness or a stray celebratory bullet, requires the existing supervisory mechanisms, preventive police measures in the field and the sanctions regime to be operated with a radical and uncompromising approach.
The Legal Nature of a Firearm Licence: A Fundamental Right or an Exceptional Police Permit?
In Turkey, the manufacture, acquisition, carrying, possession, transfer and destruction of firearms are governed by Law No. 6136 on Firearms, Knives and Other Instruments and the related secondary legislation. Individual armament is an area that carries a direct and high risk for public order, social welfare and general safety of life. For this reason, neither positive law nor settled case law recognises the authority to carry or possess a weapon as an independent fundamental right or an individual privilege (freedom).
This constitutional principle is consistently emphasised in the settled decisions of the high courts:
- Council of State (Danıştay), 10th Chamber (04.10.2023, E. 2019/7081, K. 2023/5064) and Council of State, 15th Chamber (20.02.2018, E. 2016/4546, K. 2018/1954): “Obtaining a licence to carry or possess a weapon, which cannot be defined as a fundamental right and freedom, cannot be regarded as a right granted to everyone.” (To the same effect: Council of State 10th Chamber, E. 2019/7120, K. 2023/5065; Council of State 15th Chamber, E. 2014/490; E. 2016/5928, K. 2018/3378; E. 2016/5159, K. 2017/7120; E. 2016/9947, K. 2017/1239).
- Istanbul Regional Administrative Court, 10th Administrative Chamber (07.01.2020, E. 2019/3160, K. 2020/22): “Within the framework of the legal certainty and public order that the rule of law aims to protect, the carrying and possession of firearms by persons other than the State’s military and law enforcement forces constitutes an exceptional and special authorisation, not a right.”
- Council of State, 2nd Chamber (18.10.2023, E. 2022/2758, K. 2023/4828): underlined the principle that “the possession or carrying of any weapon is subject to obtaining a licence under certain conditions set out in Law No. 6136, and unless these conditions are met and a licence is obtained, the possession or carrying of any weapon is prohibited”.
Consequently, in order to protect public safety and the right to life of individuals, the administration manages firearm permits, which are an exception to the general rule, with a strict discretionary power as an “individual administrative police measure”.
I. Types of Firearm Licences and Key Legal Concepts
1. The Distinction Between a Carry Licence and a Possession Licence
Under Articles 6 and 7 of Law No. 6136, firearm licences fall into two basic categories:
- Possession Licence: Allows the weapon to be kept only at the residence (home) or the workplace. It never permits the weapon to be carried on the person, in the street, in a vehicle or in any area open to the public.
- Carry Licence: Grants persons meeting the stricter special conditions required by the Law the authority to carry the weapon on their person and in public spaces. Since a carry licence creates a direct and intense risk to public safety, the administration’s discretion and security vetting are applied far more strictly.
Both types of licence are legally valid for five years (5 years), provided that the relevant fees are paid and the conditions continue to be met.
2. Key Legal Concepts and Administrative Institutions
- Administrative Permit / Police Measure: The granting, renewal, suspension or revocation of a firearm licence are acts aimed at ensuring public welfare, in respect of which the administration enjoys broad discretion in favour of public order.
- Taking into Custody (Temporary Safekeeping): The seizure and safekeeping of a weapon by law enforcement units as a precautionary measure because of ongoing criminal proceedings or a protective order issued under Law No. 6284.
- Revocation of the Licence: The definitive termination of the administrative permit where the statutory conditions or the quality of trustworthiness are lost, the licence is not renewed in time, or the duty of care in safekeeping is breached.
- Stray (Spent) Bullet: A case in which a bullet fired from a firearm loses its initial muzzle velocity, falls freely under the effect of gravity and causes death or injury.
- Independent Endangerment Offence (Art. 13/A): The act of causing a weapon to fall into the hands of a child by breaching the duty of care, even if no harm results.
II. Conditions for Obtaining a Licence and the Administration’s Discretion
1. The Limits of the Administration’s Discretion and the Public Interest
When dealing with firearm licence applications, the administration takes into account the applicant’s social circumstances, professional activity, physical and psychological condition, propensity to commit offences and, above all, the public interest. Settled case law reinforces the protective and security-oriented role of the administration in this respect:
- Council of State, 10th Chamber (11.10.2023, E. 2019/10344, K. 2023/5470): held that the licensing conditions “have been made subject to special and onerous requirements in order to ensure that only persons whom society can trust benefit from this authority, thereby safeguarding the public interest and public security”.
- Council of State, 15th Chamber (07.12.2017, E. 2016/9116, K. 2017/7392): although Article 7 of the Firearms Regulation provides that governors may grant licences to persons whose safety of life is under threat, the Chamber ruled that the Governor’s Office has discretion having regard to public security and that rejecting an application is lawful where “there is no concrete information or documentation showing that the applicant’s safety of life is exposed to serious and external threats”.
- Court of Cassation (Yargıtay), Criminal General Assembly (06.11.2007, E. 2007/202, K. 2007/230): emphasised that the discretion of governors cannot be arbitrary and must be open to judicial review and based on concrete reasons; it also confirmed, with reference to Circular No. 129 of the Ministry of the Interior dated 25.06.1998, that governorships may grant licences only to persons who reside, work or actually carry on professional activity within their own provincial boundaries.
2. Legal Circumstances That Bar the Grant of a Licence
The obstacles listed in Article 7 of Law No. 6136 and Article 16 of the related Regulation are assessed in two groups: absolute and relative obstacles.
A. Absolute and Permanent Obstacles (Even if Pardoned):
- Persons convicted of the offences set out in the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Chapters of Part Four of Book Two of the Turkish Criminal Code No. 5237 (TCK) (Offences against the Security of the State, the Constitutional Order, National Defence, State Secrets and Espionage) and of offences within the scope of Anti-Terror Law No. 3713.
- Even if the statute of limitations has expired, an amnesty has been granted, the conviction has been expunged with all its consequences or the criminal record has been deleted, these persons may under no circumstances be granted a carry or possession licence (Council of State 10th Chamber, 06.03.2024, E. 2020/6410, K. 2024/534).
- Persons convicted of dishonourable offences such as theft, fraud, forgery, breach of trust, bribery, extortion by public officials, smuggling and bid rigging permanently lose the right to a licence.
B. Time-Limited and Conditional Obstacles:
- Persons convicted of offences committed with a firearm, and persons sentenced to more than 1 year’s imprisonment (excluding negligent offences), cannot be granted a licence unless 5 years have passed since the completion of the execution of the sentence and a court decision on the restoration of forfeited rights (memnu hakların iadesi) has been obtained.
- Even if short-term prison sentences imposed by the courts have been converted into judicial fines, the original prison sentence is taken as the basis when determining the licensing obstacle (Council of State 10th Chamber, 04.10.2023, E. 2019/7120, K. 2023/5065).
C. Domestic Violence Measures (Obstacle under Law No. 6284):
For persons against whom a protective or preventive order has been issued under Law No. 6284 on the Protection of the Family and the Prevention of Violence against Women, carry and possession permits are immediately suspended for the duration of the order, new licence or renewal applications are halted, and their existing weapons (including weapons held for public duty) are placed in judicial custody by law enforcement.
III. Licence Supervision, Suspension and Revocation
1. Breach of Time Limits and Notification That the Reason for Issue Has Ended (Law 6136 Art. 6/1)
If the reason for which a firearm licence was issued ceases to exist, the licence holder is obliged to notify the competent administrative authority within 6 months. The licences of those who fail to notify, or who do not renew within 6 months after the 5-year validity period has expired, are revoked. However, a new licence may be issued to persons who continue to meet the legal requirements, provided that they pay the administrative fine imposed by the district governor or governor.
Council of State, 15th Chamber (20.02.2018, E. 2016/4546, K. 2018/1954 and 05.04.2018, E. 2016/5928, K. 2018/3378): held that a revocation made because the licence was not renewed in time or because no notification was made does not permanently remove the person’s right to obtain a licence; a new licence may be issued if the administrative fine is paid and the legal conditions are met.
2. Suspension and Taking into Custody During Ongoing Proceedings
Since the protection of public safety takes priority, the administration applies suspensive measures to persons who are subject to criminal prosecution:
- Suspension for Catalogue Offences: The licence procedures of persons prosecuted for catalogue offences, or suspended from duty on allegations of links or affiliation with terrorist organisations, are frozen and their weapons are taken into custody (Council of State 10th Chamber, 18.03.2021, E. 2019/8228, K. 2021/1242). Even if the court of first instance acquits, the weapon is not returned and the licence is not renewed until the judgment has passed through the appeal stages (istinaf/temyiz) and become final.
- Legal Nature of the Precautionary Measure: Taking into custody the weapons of suspects tried for offences carrying an upper limit of more than 1 year’s imprisonment (excluding negligent offences) is a preventive measure and does not violate the presumption of innocence (Council of State 15th Chamber, 20.11.2015, E. 2015/6043, K. 2015/7912 and 22.05.2018, E. 2016/9851, K. 2018/5116).
3. The Fate of Seized Weapons and Deferral of the Announcement of the Verdict (HAGB)
- Seizure and Transfer Procedure (Court of Cassation 8th Criminal Chamber, 21.05.2025, E. 2024/18969, K. 2025/4085): The weapons of persons who subsequently lose the conditions for holding a licence are seized by law enforcement. They must be transferred, within 6 months of the date of seizure, to qualified persons entitled to purchase a weapon. Weapons that cannot be transferred within this period are referred to the judicial authorities. Filing an action for the annulment of the administrative act does not automatically stay its execution.
- Deferral of the Announcement of the Verdict (HAGB) (Court of Cassation 8th Criminal Chamber, 03.07.2024, E. 2024/16503, K. 2024/5802): For persons in respect of whom an HAGB decision was given and who have duly completed the probation period without intentionally committing a new offence, the court must hold a hearing and formally assess the dismissal decision before their licensed weapons held by the administration can be returned.
IV. Safekeeping of a Licensed Weapon, Allowing Others to Use It, and Strict Liability
A firearm licence is a strictly personal authorisation; it is granted not to the weapon but to the specific individual who has passed administrative and psychological vetting. Accordingly, transferring a weapon, the way it is stored, or its falling into someone else’s hands are subject to very severe criminal consequences.
1. Prohibition on Handing Over to Others and Lifetime Revocation (Law 6136 Art. 9)
The Law expressly provides: “Those who hold permission to carry firearms may not sell these weapons to anyone other than persons holding an official licence, nor may they give them to others, even temporarily.”
Where the licence holder commits an offence with the weapon, or where, as a result of his or her negligence in safekeeping, another person commits an offence with it or attempts suicide, the firearm licence is withdrawn and the person will never again be granted a licence for life.
- Independence from the Criminal Case (Council of State 10th Chamber, 27.10.2020, E. 2016/527, K. 2020/4282): In a case where a friend took a weapon covered by a possession licence that the holder kept in his car and injured someone else, the licence holder’s negligence in safekeeping was established and his licence was revoked. The High Court expressly stated that a conviction by a criminal court is not required for administrative revocation of the licence, and that the administrative revocation remains valid even if an acquittal or a dismissal decision is given.
- Proof of Negligence (Council of State 15th Chamber, 10.04.2017, E. 2016/326, K. 2017/1671): Negligence and fault in safekeeping may be proven concretely not only by court decisions but also by prosecution records, crime scene investigation reports and administrative investigation documents.
2. The Offence of a Weapon Falling into the Hands of Children (Law 6136 Art. 13/A)
In order to prevent weapons from being left accessible to children at home through carelessness, the legislature has created an independent criminal provision:
“A person who causes a firearm to be obtained by a child by keeping it in breach of the duty of attention and care shall, provided the act does not constitute another offence requiring a heavier penalty, be punished with imprisonment from one to three years.” (Law 6136 Art. 13/A)
- Concrete Endangerment Offence: For this offence to be established, it is not necessary for the child to injure or kill anyone. Leaving the weapon unlocked and accessible to the child is in itself sufficient for the penalty to apply.
- Aggravated Liability if Harm Occurs: If the child fires the weapon and shoots another person or harms himself or herself, the licence holder faces far heavier sanctions under the general provisions, namely TCK Art. 85 (Negligent Homicide), TCK Art. 89 (Negligent Injury) or TCK Arts. 37-40 (Participation in an Offence).
3. Graduated Sanctions for Theft or Loss of a Weapon
Under Article 9 of Law No. 6136, a person whose weapon is stolen or lost for a second time may, on a new application, be granted a permit for only one weapon. A person whose weapon is lost or stolen for a third time has the licence withdrawn immediately; no new licence is granted until 5 years have passed from the date of the incident, and after 5 years the person may apply for one weapon only.
V. Illegal Armament, Change of Address and Parts Violations (Law No. 7533)
With Law No. 7533, which entered into force on 30 November 2024, the sanction provisions of Law No. 6136 underwent a fundamental revision, and the penalties for carrying and possessing unlicensed weapons and for trafficking in weapon parts were increased significantly:
| Type of Act / Nature of the Weapon | Prescribed Judicial / Administrative Sanction | Legal Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Purchasing, carrying or possessing unlicensed firearms, ammunition or main/ballistic parts (barrel, slide, frame, receiver, cylinder, bolt head, extractor, claw, firing pin) | Imprisonment from 2 to 4 years and a judicial fine of 100 to 500 days | Law No. 6136 Art. 13/1 |
| Where the weapons or ammunition are serious in nature or quantity | Imprisonment from 5 to 8 years and a judicial fine of 500 to 5,000 days | Law No. 6136 Art. 13/2 |
| Keeping 1 non-serious weapon and its customary ammunition at home/at the workplace | Imprisonment from 1 to 3 years and a judicial fine of 100 to 500 days | Law No. 6136 Art. 13/3 |
| Where the ammunition or parts are very few in number and not serious in nature | Imprisonment of up to 6 months and a judicial fine of 30 to 500 days | Law No. 6136 Art. 13/4 |
| Breach of licensing/renewal obligations in situations such as death, transfer or conviction | Administrative fine from TRY 10,000 to TRY 25,000 (imposed by the district governor/governor) | Law No. 6136 Art. 13/5, 7 |
| Moving the weapon because of a change of residence or workplace without obtaining a Transport Permit | Administrative fine from TRY 10,000 to TRY 25,000 (imposed by the district governor/governor) | Law No. 6136 Art. 13/6, 7 |
Transport Permit Procedure and the Courts’ Approach (Samsun Regional Court of Appeal, 6th Criminal Chamber, 21.09.2017, E. 2017/1516, K. 2017/1727): Taking a weapon covered by a possession licence to a new address after a change of address without a transport permit is not the offence of carrying an unlicensed weapon but an administrative procedural omission; ordering the confiscation of the weapon is unlawful. Under the current legislation, this act is sanctioned under Art. 13/6 by an administrative fine imposed by the district governor or governor.
VI. Sensitive Areas Where Carrying a Weapon Is Absolutely Prohibited (Additional Article 1)
Under Additional Article 1 of Law No. 6136, entering the following sensitive places with a weapon is absolutely prohibited by law, even if the person holds a valid carry licence:
- Courtrooms and courthouse buildings,
- Psychiatric departments and wards of hospitals,
- Penal institutions and remand prisons and their annexes,
- Student dormitories and hostels,
- Educational institutions,
- Areas where meetings and demonstration marches are held,
- Stadiums and grounds where sports competitions take place,
- The buildings and annexes of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM).
Sanction (Additional Article 1/4): Persons who enter these prohibited areas with a weapon are subject to a judicial fine of not less than fifty days. In addition, their carry licences are immediately revoked and converted into possession licences, and they cannot be granted a carry licence again until 5 years have passed from the execution of the sentence.
VII. Views in Legal Doctrine, Conflicts and Civic Responsibility
1. Grading Fault in “Stray Bullet” Cases
In cases where third parties are killed or injured as a result of reckless shooting into the air at weddings, engagement parties, send-offs for military service, football celebrations or in residential areas, legal doctrine and the courts apply the following criteria:
- The Conscious Negligence View: Firing in a deserted open field completely away from residential areas, in the belief that nobody is present, is in exceptional cases considered to be on the borderline of conscious negligence (TCK Art. 22/3).
- The Eventual Intent (Dolus Eventualis) Approach (Prevailing Case Law): A perpetrator who fires into the air in residential areas or in open or enclosed places where people gather is deemed to have foreseen that the bullet may fall back to the ground under gravity and hit someone, and to have acted with indifference, accepting that outcome. According to the settled decisions of the Court of Cassation, if death results from such an act, the perpetrator is sentenced for Homicide with Eventual Intent under TCK Art. 81 and Art. 21/2, with a reduction applied from aggravated life imprisonment. In cases of injury, the provisions on intentional injury with eventual intent apply, and these cases fall outside the scope of the summary trial (seri muhakeme) procedure.
2. The Conflict Between the Presumption of Innocence and Preventive Police Measures
- Security-Oriented / Preventive Approach: According to this view, predominantly adopted in judicial decisions, since the granting of a firearm licence serves to maintain public order, it is lawful for the administration to require the applicant to be “free from any suspicion of crime”. Taking the weapon into custody during the prosecution stage does not undermine the presumption of innocence.
- Rights-Based Critical Approach: The suspension of the licences of citizens against whom there is not yet any final conviction, or the refusal to return a weapon despite an acquittal on the grounds that appeal proceedings are pending, is debated in legal doctrine in the light of the right to property, the right not to be stigmatised and the presumption of innocence.
3. Gaps in Supervision and Legislation
- Lack of Dynamic Psychological Monitoring: Because firearm licences are valid for 5 years, the greatest structural gap is the absence of a dynamic and periodic monitoring mechanism that tracks breakdowns in the licence holder’s psychological and mental state, anger control problems or annual ammunition consumption during this period.
- Police Surrender Procedures: In orders for removal from the home and surrender of weapons issued under Law No. 6284, coordination delays between law enforcement units and the judicial custody office at the stage of physically removing the possession-licensed weapon from the home invite loss of life.
4. The Sociological and Psychological Dimension: Cultural Illusion, Ego Gratification and the Collapse of Individual Self-Control
Despite the heavy toll caused by individual armament and lack of supervision, and the deep wound it has opened in society, the reason why the problem cannot be curbed by statutory regulation and criminal sanctions alone lies in a far more deep-rooted psychological and socio-cultural illusion: in certain segments of our society, the firearm is coded not so much as a rational and legitimate security need, but as an archaic symbol of power, a false shield of immunity and a primitive instrument of psychological ego gratification through which suppressed emotions are released. The artificial self-confidence instilled by a gun carried on the waist or kept in the glove compartment completely paralyses the individual’s internal braking mechanism over his or her own anger and impulses — that is, individual self-control — turning the simplest traffic dispute or a moment of celebration into an irreparable scene of death. Despite the young lives lost to stray celebratory bullets, the families torn apart and the deep wounds bleeding in society, the inability of individuals to exercise self-control, regarding the gun as a sign of prestige and superiority, both dulls society’s own internal control reflex and delays the public authorities in resolutely operating regular psychological and practical supervision mechanisms. However much the legal rules are tightened, unless this unhealthy cultural mindset that sees the gun as an extension of individual ego gratification and so-called masculinity is confronted as a whole, and unless self-control is built through civic awareness, it does not seem possible for this social wound to heal permanently.
VIII. Practical Application and Lessons from Concrete Cases
- The Defence “The Gun Was Mine and Licensed, My Spouse/Child Used It” Is Legally Invalid: Intentionally giving a licensed weapon to family members or friends gives rise to liability for participation in the offence (Arts. 37-40) under the TCK. If the weapon is obtained by another person as a result of negligence, the licence holder loses the right to obtain a firearm licence for life under Article 9 of Law No. 6136.
- A Child’s Access to a Weapon Is a Direct Ground for Imprisonment: If a weapon that is not kept locked and secure at home is obtained by a child, a public prosecution seeking imprisonment of 1 to 3 years is brought against the licence holder even if nobody is killed or injured (Law 6136 Art. 13/A).
- A Transport Permit Must Be Obtained When Changing Address: Holders of possession licences who change their residential or business address and move the weapon to the new address without obtaining a Weapon Transport Permit will have to pay an administrative fine of between TRY 10,000 and TRY 25,000 imposed by the district governor or governor (Art. 13/6).
- Transfers Are Not Completed by a Notarial Sale Alone: When transferring a licensed weapon, even if a notarial sale has been made, the weapon cannot be physically handed over until an official licence has been issued by the governorship in the name of the transferee. An irregular transfer is subject to both criminal penalties and administrative sanctions.
IX. Conclusion and Assessment
A firearm licence is not a certificate of freedom or privilege granting its holder unlimited freedom of action, but has the status of an exceptional administrative permit imposing a high duty of care and heightened legal responsibility. Considering the threats to safety of life that individual armament and lack of supervision create in society, the administration’s uncompromising stance in licensing, renewal and supervision procedures is a natural requirement of the constitutional public interest.
The most fundamental legal obligation of licence holders is to store the weapon in a certified steel safe and with locked storage so that third parties, strangers and especially children can under no circumstances access it. A breach of this duty of care does not result only in administrative fines or licence revocations; it also leads to severe custodial sentences and moral devastation that is hard to repair. In administrative disputes and criminal investigations concerning firearms, in order to avoid irreparable loss of rights, it is advisable that the specific circumstances of the matter be assessed carefully and that the process be conducted with professional legal advice from a criminal lawyer.
Legal Notice: This text has been prepared for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. sophoshukuk.com makes no referral, guarantee or promise of outcome. Each case must be assessed on its own particular circumstances; for your specific dispute, please obtain professional advice from a lawyer.