Sophos Hukuk Bürosu

Extraordinary Legal Remedies in Turkish Administrative Courts: Renewal of Proceedings and Reversal in the Interest of the Law

Yazar: Yayın:

In a state governed by the rule of law, the fundamental purpose of judicial proceedings is to resolve disputes between individuals and the administration in accordance with the law, the material truth and equity. The formal and substantive finality of court decisions (final judgment / res judicata) is a requirement of the principles of legal stability and legal certainty. However, serious procedural errors during the proceedings, a finding of forgery, new evidence that emerges later, or violations of fundamental human rights may upset the balance between res judicata and substantive justice. In Turkish administrative procedure law, extraordinary legal remedies have been provided in order to correct this imbalance.

Particularly in disputes that directly affect the right of ownership – such as zoning plans, Article 18 land readjustment (parcelling) procedures, building permits and demolition orders for unauthorised buildings, expropriation and compensation for unlawful occupation (ecrimisil) – decisions of the administrative courts determine the legal status of real estate. In this guide, drawing on a master’s thesis in public law entitled “Extraordinary Legal Remedies in Administrative Jurisdiction” and current case law, the institutions of renewal of proceedings (Art. 53 İYUK) and reversal in the interest of the law (Art. 51 İYUK) are examined from the perspective of zoning and real estate law.

📑 Table of Contents

1. The System of Legal Remedies in Administrative Jurisdiction (Ordinary vs. Extraordinary)

In the system of the Administrative Procedure Law No. 2577 (İYUK), remedies against court decisions are divided into two categories according to whether the decision has become final:

(With the introduction of the appeal (istinaf) system in administrative jurisdiction by Law No. 6545, the “rectification of decision” (karar düzeltme) remedy was abolished; in current administrative court practice, only the two extraordinary legal remedies above can be used against final decisions.)

2. Renewal of Proceedings in Administrative Jurisdiction (Art. 53 İYUK)

Renewal of proceedings is an exceptional institution aimed at remedying serious defects, exhaustively listed in the law, which existed when a final administrative court decision was rendered but were outside the court’s knowledge, or which emerged subsequently.

2.1. Decisions That May Be Subject to Renewal of Proceedings

Renewal of proceedings may be sought only for decisions that finally resolve the merits of the dispute. Decisions rendered by the Council of State as a court of first instance, and final decisions on the merits of the Regional Administrative Courts and the Administrative/Tax Courts, fall within this scope. Decisions that do not bring the merits of the dispute to an end – such as stay of execution decisions, interim decisions, or decisions dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction or venue – cannot be the subject of this remedy.

2.2. Statutory Grounds (Art. 53/1 İYUK)

Article 53/1 İYUK lists the grounds for renewal of proceedings exhaustively; they cannot be extended by analogy:

Statutory Ground Legal Provision Practical Relevance in Real Estate and Zoning Law
1. Discovery of a New Document Art. 53/1-a İYUK Subsequent discovery of official documents that could not be obtained during the case and that could affect the decision (e.g. a decision annulling a zoning plan, a cadastral renewal record).
2. Establishment That a Document Is Forged Art. 53/1-b İYUK Establishment by a final court judgment that the title deed record, power of attorney or official report on which the decision was based is forged.
3. Removal of the Underlying Court Judgment Art. 53/1-c İYUK Reversal by a final judgment, or invalidity, of another court judgment on which the administrative court decision was based (e.g. annulment of a higher-scale 1/5000 master zoning plan).
4. Expert’s Deliberately False Report Art. 53/1-d İYUK A criminal court decision becoming final establishing that the expert report on which the judgment was based was drawn up contrary to the truth.
5. Use of Fraud Art. 53/1-e İYUK The party in whose favour the decision was given having committed fraudulent acts capable of affecting the proceedings (e.g. deliberately improper service of process).
6. Unauthorised Representation Art. 53/1-f İYUK The case having been heard and concluded in the presence of persons who were not attorneys or legal representatives.
7. Participation of a Disqualified Judge Art. 53/1-g İYUK A judge who was legally barred from hearing the case, or obliged to recuse themselves, having taken part in the judgment.
8. Conflicting Judgments Art. 53/1-h İYUK The existence of two contradictory final decisions in cases between the same parties, on the same subject and based on the same cause of action.
9. ECtHR Violation Judgment Art. 53/1-ı İYUK The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) holding that the decision violated the ECHR and its Protocols (in particular the right to property under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).

2.3. Time Limits for Application and Stay of Execution

The time limit for requesting renewal of proceedings is 60 days from learning of the ground and, in any event, 1 year from the date on which the case became final. However, in cases based on forgery, fraud, a criminal court judgment or an ECtHR violation judgment, the time limits start to run from the date on which the relevant decision became final.

The application is made by a petition addressed to the court that rendered the decision. A request for renewal of proceedings does not automatically stay the execution of the earlier decision. Therefore, in order to prevent damage that would be difficult to remedy, a stay of execution (Art. 27 İYUK) should be expressly requested in the petition.

3. Reversal in the Interest of the Law in Administrative Jurisdiction (Art. 51 İYUK)

Reversal in the interest of the law (kanun yararına bozma) is an exceptional extraordinary legal remedy used where decisions of administrative, tax and regional administrative courts that have become final without passing through appeal or cassation review produce a result that is contrary to the law in force.

4. Extraordinary Legal Remedies in Zoning and Real Estate Disputes

In the Alanya and Antalya region, where the real estate and construction sector is very active, a significant proportion of property disputes arise from administrative acts. In this context, the main situations in which extraordinary legal remedies come into play are as follows:

In property and zoning disputes, having the file assessed by a lawyer in light of the applicable procedural and substantive rules reduces the risk of losing rights to a minimum.

5. Procedural Rules and Professional Representation in Administrative Proceedings

Administrative jurisdiction is the field in which formal rules regarding time limits and petitions are applied most strictly. In extraordinary legal remedies against final decisions, monitoring the 60-day and 1-year limitation periods and correctly establishing the legal link between the administrative court judgment and actions for cancellation and re-registration of title deeds before the civil courts require meticulous work. It is advisable to seek professional legal advice from a lawyer in order to avoid possible procedural dismissals.

6. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

When can renewal of proceedings be requested against a final administrative court decision?

Provided that one of the 9 statutory grounds listed in Article 53/1 İYUK has occurred, it may be requested within 60 days of learning of the ground and, as a rule, within 1 year of the decision becoming final.

Does an application for renewal of proceedings automatically stay the enforcement of the decision?

No, the application does not automatically stay execution. In order to prevent the decision from being implemented, a stay of execution must be requested separately from the court.

If a zoning plan is annulled, can renewal of proceedings be requested for earlier building permit and zoning cases?

Yes. The annulment by the administrative courts of the higher-scale zoning plan on which a zoning implementation or the cancellation of a permit was based may constitute a ground for renewal of proceedings under Article 53/1-c or Article 53/1-a İYUK.

Can a citizen apply directly to the Council of State for reversal in the interest of the law?

No. The power to request reversal in the interest of the law belongs exclusively to the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Council of State. Citizens submit their reasoned requests to the Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Council of State; if the Office finds it appropriate, it forwards the application to a Chamber of the Council of State.

Which administrative court has jurisdiction over real estate and zoning cases in Alanya?

In administrative cases concerning immovable properties and municipal acts within the administrative boundaries of Alanya, the competent first-instance courts are the Antalya Administrative Courts, and the appellate (istinaf) review authority is the Konya Regional Administrative Court.

7. Conclusion and Legal Assessment

The institutions of renewal of proceedings and reversal in the interest of the law, regulated in the İYUK No. 2577, are exceptional safeguards introduced to remedy serious legal defects that emerge in final decisions. In real estate, zoning and administrative disputes, the careful observance of time limits and statutory conditions prevents losses of rights.

Legal Notice: This text has been prepared for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. sophoshukuk.com makes no referral, guarantee or promise of outcome. Each case must be assessed on its own particular circumstances; for your specific dispute, please obtain professional advice from a lawyer.